Thursday, October 14, 2010

Acceptably average?

Northanger Abbey may have been written to satirize gothic novels, but many of Austen's descriptions suggest that she intended Catherine's run-of-the-mill personality to be something her readers could identify with and relate to. The narrative tone throughout the novel is arguably condescending and disdainful; however, despite the fact the narrator's compliments are often tinged with sarcasm, it is clear that Catherine is not a villain of any sort and thus perhaps not worthy of true contempt. In several instances, especially those in which Catherine's character contrasts noticeably with that of another figure, the narrator seems appreciative of the fact that Catherine is not just another a stereotypical female of the time. Although she is presented as "as plain as any" (9) and one who has "by nature nothing heroic about her" (10), Catherine's enjoyment of reading and disinterest in much of the social activities popular with those around her sets her apart in a way that the narrator seems to value. Indeed, Austen's self-insertion in which she defends novels (29) suggests that her description of the adolescent Catherine as having the ability to comprehend and appreciate written works is admiring.

It is possible that Catherine is one of the only characters to whom Austen intended for us to relate. Catherine possesses neither stunning beauty or remarkable intelligence, but her ordinariness doesn't keep her from getting immersed in a good story. Both feelings of plainness and social naivety, traits of Catherine's which are highlighted constantly throughout the novel, are experiences that most people have at one time had. Austen herself may have at one time felt herself to be socially lackluster, and therefore created a character that embodies a plethora of mundane traits so as to give readers with a similar mindset someone they could relate to.

2 comments:

  1. I heartily agree with Maria in regards to how impressively average Catherine is. It’s the Twilight effect. Just insert a criminally bland main character (Bella) for your audience (usually female) to put themselves in the shoes in. When a character lacks any discernable traits to separate them from the crowd, the reader is forced to put their own spin on him/her. Now that I think about it, all of the other characters had more of a personality than she did. Henry was intelligent and earnest, and even Isabella’s selfishness was a trait that defined her character. Though I suppose that if one were forced to assign a trait to Catherine, it would be just a general essence of immaturity brought on by a lack of social interaction, but it could just as easily be defined as youthfulness. If feminine education was more popular in this time, it wouldn’t be a stretch to believe that this book was targeted at early 19th century tweens.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree somewhat with what you are saying maria. Sure Catharine is average, and meant to be a heroine in which the average female reader can relate to. I think that Catharine also serves to further bring out the uniqueness of the side characters. In fact, it seems to me that Austen is going against the female gothic novel heroine prototype where everything is focused on how the heroine develops. Instead, Austen is focusing more on the development of the side characters and lowering the importance of the main

    ReplyDelete